Calls for solicitors to deliver greater cost transparency to ‘vulnerable’ consumers

Dementia_trees_-croppedjpg

New research carried out by the Legal Services Board (LSB) suggests that the majority of 'vulnerable' legal services consumers who have mental health conditions such as dementia would benefit from greater cost transparency.

The study, which surveyed 60 mentally ill clients and consumers found that, for the most part, such consumers received an "extremely positive" and "appropriate" service from their solicitor.

However, it found that the majority of consumers wanted their advisers to give them more information in terms of costs.

Many clients said that they would like to see services that are not only price-transparent, but also "jargon-free" to enable vulnerable clients to better understand how their solicitor can help them.

The LSB's researchers found that many clients "felt confused about the services on offer" and "needed more time or space" to decide which steps they wanted to follow when enquiring about popular services such as Wills or Lasting Powers of Attorney (LPAs).

Commenting, Neil Buckley, chief executive at the LSB, said: "Sometimes small actions can make a big difference to consumers, particularly those who are vulnerable.

"When providers take simple practical steps this can make a big difference to the consumer experience.

"Consumers can help too, for example, by telling their lawyer if there are things they could do that would help make things easier for them."

The Board have produced two useful guides, which are reproduced here and the full reports are available for download below


File Name: Dementia_report_FINAL
File Size: 690 kb
Download File
File Name: Mental_Health_report_FINAL
File Size: 632 kb
Download File
A Holiday in Ireland
Employment Tribunal Fees Scrapped - £27 million to...

News Search

News Tag Cloud

Administrators Assessment ATE premium Bill Brethertons LLP BT-2 Solicitors Camps Solicitors Carpenters Cash Account Children Claims Management Companies Client Care Letters Closure Cold Callers Collier Law Commercial Comparison Compensation Conditional Fee Agreement Coops Law Cordell & Co Costs Estimates costs law Court CPR 46.9(3) Damages debts Deduction Delivery Up Disclosure Divorce Emerald Law Solicitors Employment Tribunal cases Equitas Solicitors Estates Exempt Fairwoods Solicitors Family Fees Final Bills Fixed Costs Fletchers Solicitors Forster Dean Garvins Law Gowing Law HCC Solicitors Holiday Holiday Sickness Claim Inheritance Act Insolvency Interim Statute Bills Irwin Mitchell LLP JC&A Solicitors Keith Smart & Co Lance Mason landmark case Lawyers Legal challenges Legal Ombudsman Legend Legal LIP's Litigants in person Litigation Litigation Friend Matrix Solicitors Michael Lewin Solicitors Michael Rose & Baylis Solicitors Money Laundering Regulations Motorbike Accident No Win No Fee Overcharging partners Personal Injury Pilkington Shaw Solicitors Price Probate Progressive Solicitors Proportionality Protected Party Reasonable Notice rebuttable presumption Refund Representation Retainer Richard Slade & Company Right to conduct litigation in respect of costs Rights of Audience Road Traffic Accident Rotherham s.68 Solicitors Act s.74(3) Solicitors Act 1974 Scott Rees & Co Senior Courts Costs Office Seth Lovis & Co Simpson Millar LLP six minute units solicitor solicitors SRA Statute Bills Success Fee success fees Supreme Court tax tax management Termination Terms of Business Thorneycrofts Time limits trades Union Unison Transparency True Solicitors Turner & White Solicitors Unusual Items Viceroy Law

About Us

We are a team of legal costs experts with over 60 years' experience.

We have dealt with costs arising from almost every legal specialism.

We have conducted cases challenging solicitor's costs at all levels up to and including the Court of Appeal.

We are not part of a firm of solicitors and are therefore entirely independent.

Latest News

Links