Cowell -v- Thorneycroft Solicitors Limited : £613.75 ordered to be refunded

Spending-money-on-children I'm not really sure I know what I will be spending my refund on...but I'm sure my children do!

CFA found to be a "CFA lite" and success fee reduced to 15%

Check my legal fee are very professional. I found the process easy. Kerry Anne was a wonder in helping me understand, explaining certain things I didn't understand and letting me know every part of the process.

I'm not really sure what I will be spending my refund on at present but I'm sure my children do!

I am very grateful to Kerry Anne for helping with this process and even responding to a not so very nice email I received from my previous solicitors.

I would definitely recommend Checkmylegalfees !!!!!!

Natalya Cowell, 20th August 2019

​Miss.Cowell had been involved in a road traffic accident on 5th August 2016 when, as she was exiting a roundabout, another car pulled on to the roundabout and collided with the rear passenger side of her vehicle, causing whiplash injuries.

She instructed Thorneycroft Solicitors Limited of Macclesfield in June 2017 and, having entered into a "no win, no fee" agreement (technically called a Conditional Fee Agreement) they started the claim by submitting a claim form via the online RTA portal on 9th June 2017. The other driver's insurers admitted liability two weeks later on 22nd June 2017.

The case was finally settled on 16th October 2017 for damages totalling £2,995.

Thorneycrofts, who had taken the fixed fees of £500 plus VAT that they were entitled to from the other driver's insurers, deducted further fees from Miss.Cowell's damages made up of £673.75 including VAT for their own fees, and the cost of an "after the event" insurance premium in the sum of £190.18.

Miss.Cowell instructed Checkmylegalfees.com in December 2017, worried that she had been overcharged.

We requested papers from Throneycrofts on 6th December 2017 and, rather than complying with our request, they wrote direct to Miss.Cowell on 2nd March 2018 indicating that, because she had intimated a claim through us, they would now be looking to her for what they said were their "unrecovered" costs of £731.70.

We immediately wrote to them pointing out that this was misguided.

Rather than releasing the papers so that we could check whether or not there had been an overcharge, Thorneycrofts refused to release the papers unless this additional sum was paid.

So, in May 2018 we issued an application to the High Court (the Senior Courts Costs Office), forcing them to deliver their bill, so that we could check it properly. On 2nd July 2018 the High Court ordered Thorneycrofts to deliver their formal bill (known technically as a "statute bill") and to pay Miss.Cowell's costs.

When the bill was delivered on 1st August 2018, Thorneycrofts had quite sensibly abandoned their claim that they were entitled to an additional £731.70, but it was clear to us from the terms of the "no win, no fee" agreement and the surrounding documentation that they had charged too much in the first place.

An application was issued on 2nd August 2018 in the High Court in Sheffield for the court to assess the bill.

After quite lengthy proceedings, in which Thorneycrofts argued that they were fully entitled to charge what they did, the Court agreed with us about the interpretation of the "no win, no fee" agreement, and ordered a refund of £613.75, along with payment of Miss.Cowell's costs.

Miss.Cowell's case demonstrates that - where we think our clients may have been overcharged - we will pursue their former solicitors for the right outcome no matter how long it takes and will not allow our clients to be put off by strong arm tactics. We are really pleased with her outcome, and grateful for her kind words.

Mark Carlisle, CMLF Director
Ruksaana Schutt -v- Austin Kemp Solicitors Ltd - 2...
Checkmylegalfees.com in Litigation Futures

Related Posts

News Search

News Tag Cloud

Accident at work Administrators Amanda Cunliffe Solicitors Appeal Assessment ATE premium Austin Kemp Solicitors Ltd Back Injury Bill Breach of retainer Brethertons LLP BT-2 Solicitors Camps Solicitors Carpenters Cash Account Children Claims Management Companies Client Care Letters Closure Cold Callers Collier Law Commercial Comparison Compensation Conditional Fee Agreement Coops Law Cordell & Co Costs Estimates costs law Counsel Counsel's Fees Court CPR 46.9(3) Damages debts Deduction Delivery Up DG Law Din Solicitors Disclosure Divorce Emerald Law Solicitors Employment Tribunal cases Enforcement Equitas Solicitors Estates Exempt Fairwoods Solicitors Family Family Plus Fees Final Bills Fixed Costs Fletchers Solicitors Forster Dean Forum Garvins Law Gowing Law HCC Solicitors Holiday Holiday Sickness Claim Inheritance Act Insolvency Interim Statute Bills Irwin Mitchell LLP JC&A Solicitors Jigsaw Law Keith Smart & Co Lance Mason landmark case Lawyers Legal challenges Legal Expenses Insurance Legal Ombudsman Legend Legal LIP's Litigants in person Litigation Litigation Friend Matrix Solicitors Michael Lewin Solicitors Michael Rose & Baylis Solicitors Money Laundering Regulations Motorbike Accident MTA Solicitors No Win No Fee North Solicitors Limited Overcharging partners Personal Injury Pilkington Shaw Solicitors Price Probate Progressive Solicitors Proportionality Protected Party QC Reasonable Notice rebuttable presumption Refund Representation Retainer Richard Slade & Company Right to conduct litigation in respect of costs Rights of Audience RJ Gill Solicitors Road Traffic Accident Rotherham s.68 Solicitors Act s.74(3) Solicitors Act 1974 Scott Rees & Co Senior Courts Costs Office Seth Lovis & Co Simpson Millar LLP six minute units solicitor solicitors SRA Statute Bills Success Fee success fees Supreme Court tax tax management Termination Terms of Business Thorneycrofts Time limits trades Union Unison Transparency True Solicitors Turner & White Solicitors Unusual Items Viceroy Law Woodwards Solicitors

About Us

We are a team of legal costs experts with over 60 years' experience.

We have dealt with costs arising from almost every legal specialism.

We have conducted cases challenging solicitor's costs at all levels up to and including the Court of Appeal.

We are not part of a firm of solicitors and are therefore entirely independent.

Latest News

Links