Involved in a personal injury case? Be wary of your solicitor trying to amend the terms of your "No win, no fee" agreement

Trickery An amendment to the terms may cost you more than £500

Following a recent decision by the Court of Appeal, your solicitor may try to clarify or even amend the terms of your "no win, no fee" agreement. They have been urged to do so by a costs expert who regularly acts for solicitors in an article in today's Law Society Gazette.

The reason for this is that in Herbert -v- HH Law Limited the Court of Appeal found that the practice (which has been largely standard amongst personal injury solicitors since 2013) of applying a 100% success fee in all personal injury cases, regardless of how difficult they were, was wrong and that unless the solicitor explained that the 100% was simply "standard practice", then it should have been calculated in a way that reflects the risk of not winning the case.

In most road traffic accident cases the appropriate success fee based on risk will be 15% rather then 100%

This is important because in most cases it is the success fee that is deducted from your damages at the end of the case and, clearly, with a success fee of 100%, substantially more gets deducted. In most cases it is likely to make a difference to you of at least £500. In some cases the difference could be considerably more.

If your solicitor asks to clarify or amend the terms of your agreement they are bound, we think, by their professional obligations to explain the financial consequences to you.

You should be given the following options -

1. Continuing with the original terms (which will mean that a lower amount will be deducted from your damages)

2. Accepting the clarification or amendment (which will mean that a higher amount will be deducted from your damages)

If the options are presented in any other way, or if your solicitors say that this is necessary for any reason other than them wanting to get paid more from your case, then you can probably conclude that your solicitors are not being entirely honest with you. 

Do not be pressured into accepting the new terms. You are not obliged to accept them and, if your solicitors are not prepared to continue the case on the original terms, they would need to terminate the "no win, no fee" agreement without charging you anything at all. You would then be in a position to go elsewhere (with more reasonable charging) or even conclude the case by yourself. 

If you are asked by your solicitor to clarify or amend your agreement and you have any concerns, we will be happy to give you our advice entirely free of charge. Just use our online chat app, or email This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

A lovely testimonial from Mr & Mrs.Lane following ...
Keith Smart & Co : Solicitor struck off for overch...

Related Posts

News Search

News Tag Cloud

Administrators Appeal Assessment ATE premium Bill Breach of retainer Brethertons LLP BT-2 Solicitors Camps Solicitors Carpenters Cash Account Children Claims Management Companies Client Care Letters Closure Cold Callers Collier Law Commercial Comparison Compensation Conditional Fee Agreement Coops Law Cordell & Co Costs Estimates costs law Counsel Counsel's Fees Court CPR 46.9(3) Damages debts Deduction Delivery Up DG Law Disclosure Divorce Emerald Law Solicitors Employment Tribunal cases Enforcement Equitas Solicitors Estates Exempt Fairwoods Solicitors Family Family Plus Fees Final Bills Fixed Costs Fletchers Solicitors Forster Dean Forum Garvins Law Gowing Law HCC Solicitors Holiday Holiday Sickness Claim Inheritance Act Insolvency Interim Statute Bills Irwin Mitchell LLP JC&A Solicitors Keith Smart & Co Lance Mason landmark case Lawyers Legal challenges Legal Expenses Insurance Legal Ombudsman Legend Legal LIP's Litigants in person Litigation Litigation Friend Matrix Solicitors Michael Lewin Solicitors Michael Rose & Baylis Solicitors Money Laundering Regulations Motorbike Accident No Win No Fee North Solicitors Limited Overcharging partners Personal Injury Pilkington Shaw Solicitors Price Probate Progressive Solicitors Proportionality Protected Party QC Reasonable Notice rebuttable presumption Refund Representation Retainer Richard Slade & Company Right to conduct litigation in respect of costs Rights of Audience Road Traffic Accident Rotherham s.68 Solicitors Act s.74(3) Solicitors Act 1974 Scott Rees & Co Senior Courts Costs Office Seth Lovis & Co Simpson Millar LLP six minute units solicitor solicitors SRA Statute Bills Success Fee success fees Supreme Court tax tax management Termination Terms of Business Thorneycrofts Time limits trades Union Unison Transparency True Solicitors Turner & White Solicitors Unusual Items Viceroy Law Woodwards Solicitors

About Us

We are a team of legal costs experts with over 60 years' experience.

We have dealt with costs arising from almost every legal specialism.

We have conducted cases challenging solicitor's costs at all levels up to and including the Court of Appeal.

We are not part of a firm of solicitors and are therefore entirely independent.