James Murray -v- DG Law

Solicitors-Act-Experts An object lesson in why you should go straight to the experts

I would highly recommend this company as they don't treat you like a money pit, they treat you as a proper person. I suffer from dyslexia and sometimes struggled to understand the correspondence received from my former solicitors, who I feel let me down badly by dealing with a case that was outside their expertise. Checkmylegalfees took the time to go over every aspect of the case, either in person or over the phone, and if I needed to speak to them outside normal office hours they were always available.

I would like to thank the directors, Mark and Kerry-Anne. I have been really pleased with the service you have both given me, in fact I am over the moon

James Murray

James had instructed "boutique" firm DG Law of London SE1 to advise him in relation to the possibility of disputing a previous solicitor's fees, along with some additional matters.

DG Law agreed a fixed fee of £2,000 and drafted an application for him to issue in his own name, but the application was not properly worded, failed to identify the disputed bills, was directed to a Court that would not have jurisdiction to deal with the matter, and included an application for other relief outside the scope of the Solicitors Act that was bound to fail.

Had it been pursued to a contested hearing, the application would have risked significant costs orders against Mr.Murray.

We raised the matter on his behalf with DG Law and received an offer of a refund of £250, with no contribution to the costs that James had had to incur in instructing us. We considered this unacceptable and, having issued proceedings under the Solicitors Act against DG Law, were quickly able to resolve the matter on the basis that James receive a refund of £1,000 together with the vast majority of our costs.

We are now also pursuing the original solicitors, with a properly formulated application, issued in the appropriate court, and directed at the appropriate bills.

Eddie Quinn -v- Fletchers Solicitors : refund of £...
Badaei -v- Woodwards Solicitors : an important app...

Related Posts

News Search

News Tag Cloud

Administrators Appeal Assessment ATE premium Bill Breach of retainer Brethertons LLP BT-2 Solicitors Camps Solicitors Carpenters Cash Account Children Claims Management Companies Client Care Letters Closure Cold Callers Collier Law Commercial Comparison Compensation Conditional Fee Agreement Coops Law Cordell & Co Costs Estimates costs law Counsel Counsel's Fees Court CPR 46.9(3) Damages debts Deduction Delivery Up DG Law Disclosure Divorce Emerald Law Solicitors Employment Tribunal cases Enforcement Equitas Solicitors Estates Exempt Fairwoods Solicitors Family Family Plus Fees Final Bills Fixed Costs Fletchers Solicitors Forster Dean Forum Garvins Law Gowing Law HCC Solicitors Holiday Holiday Sickness Claim Inheritance Act Insolvency Interim Statute Bills Irwin Mitchell LLP JC&A Solicitors Keith Smart & Co Lance Mason landmark case Lawyers Legal challenges Legal Expenses Insurance Legal Ombudsman Legend Legal LIP's Litigants in person Litigation Litigation Friend Matrix Solicitors Michael Lewin Solicitors Michael Rose & Baylis Solicitors Money Laundering Regulations Motorbike Accident No Win No Fee North Solicitors Limited Overcharging partners Personal Injury Pilkington Shaw Solicitors Price Probate Progressive Solicitors Proportionality Protected Party QC Reasonable Notice rebuttable presumption Refund Representation Retainer Richard Slade & Company Right to conduct litigation in respect of costs Rights of Audience Road Traffic Accident Rotherham s.68 Solicitors Act s.74(3) Solicitors Act 1974 Scott Rees & Co Senior Courts Costs Office Seth Lovis & Co Simpson Millar LLP six minute units solicitor solicitors SRA Statute Bills Success Fee success fees Supreme Court tax tax management Termination Terms of Business Thorneycrofts Time limits trades Union Unison Transparency True Solicitors Turner & White Solicitors Unusual Items Viceroy Law Woodwards Solicitors

About Us

We are a team of legal costs experts with over 60 years' experience.

We have dealt with costs arising from almost every legal specialism.

We have conducted cases challenging solicitor's costs at all levels up to and including the Court of Appeal.

We are not part of a firm of solicitors and are therefore entirely independent.